In a surprising turn of events, Oregon’s landmark 2024 campaign finance reform, designed to curb massive political donations and increase donor transparency, may face a significant delay. A newly introduced amendment attached to House Bill 3392—originally intended as a technical correction to the original law—now proposes postponing the implementation of these reforms until 2031. The bill is set for its first public hearing shortly after its language was made available, raising concerns among advocacy groups who see the move as an underhanded attempt to weaken the law altogether. Originally passed in 2024 with bipartisan support, the legislation aimed to impose strict limits on political contributions and mandate greater disclosure of donor sources, bringing Oregon in line with most other U.S. states.
The proposed amendment was introduced by House Minority Leader Christine Drazan, a Republican representative from Canby, just hours before the scheduled hearing. If adopted, it would push the enforcement of the new regulations forward by several election cycles, effectively exempting the 2026 and 2030 gubernatorial elections from its provisions. This delay has alarmed advocates who argue that Oregon’s current system allows wealthy donors and powerful organizations to exert outsized influence over state politics. One such example includes Nike co-founder Phil Knight, who has donated over $11 million to various campaigns in recent years, including a substantial contribution to Drazan’s own unsuccessful 2022 gubernatorial bid.
Supporters of the original campaign finance measure feel misled by the sudden procedural maneuver. Jason Kafoury, an attorney and leader with Honest Elections Oregon, expressed frustration over what he described as a last-minute backroom deal. He emphasized that the majority of Oregon voters have consistently supported stronger campaign finance oversight when given the opportunity at the ballot box. Under the original 2024 law, individual contributors would be limited to $3,300 per election cycle, or $6,600 if a candidate runs in both primary and general elections. Labor unions and similar membership organizations would also face caps, with a maximum of $26,400 allowed for statewide races every two years.
Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, a Democrat, had previously urged legislative leaders to consider delaying the law’s implementation due to logistical challenges. In a letter sent in June, he outlined concerns regarding insufficient IT infrastructure, lack of outreach efforts, and inadequate staffing needed to enforce the new rules effectively. Read argued that successful rollout would require “perfect conditions,” and warned that the current timeline poses a major risk to the program’s success. However, he clarified that his office did not coordinate directly with Drazan on the amendment, though her proposal appears aligned with some of his earlier concerns.
The advisory committee tasked with overseeing the implementation of the law has encountered internal disagreements, particularly between labor and business representatives, further complicating the process. Kate Titus of Common Cause Oregon noted that while some disputes centered around legal definitions, the larger issue stemmed from Read assuming responsibility for the project only after taking office, rather than inheriting a well-established framework from his predecessor. Although she expressed sympathy for Read’s position, she questioned the need for an extended delay, emphasizing that more than a year has already passed since the law was signed into effect.
As debate continues in Salem, the outcome of this legislative maneuver will determine whether Oregon moves toward stricter campaign finance controls or remains one of the few states without meaningful restrictions. With critics decrying the proposed delay as a betrayal of voter intent and supporters citing practical hurdles, the next few days could shape the future of political accountability in the state for years to come.